Community-based perinatal mental health peer support: a realist review

10Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Peer support has been suggested as an alternative or complement to professional support for mothers with perinatal mental health difficulties. The aim of this realist review was to synthesise the evidence on perinatal mental health peer support programmes outside mental health services, to understand what is it about community-based perinatal mental health peer support that works, for whom, in what circumstances, in what respects, and why. Methods: Applying realist methodology, an initial theoretical model was tested against evidence from empirical studies. 29 empirical studies were included, covering 22 antenatal and postnatal mental health interventions that offered one-to-one or group peer support, in person or by telephone. Data extraction identified the configurations of contexts (C), mechanisms (M) and outcomes (O) relevant to mothers’ use of peer support and to the positive and negative effects of using peer support. Results: 13 C-M-O configurations explained take-up of peer support. These were based on mothers’ perceptions that peer support would offer empathetic understanding and non-judgemental acceptance outside their social circle; their relationships with primary health professionals; their cultural background and perspectives on mental health; their desire for professional support; overcoming practical barriers; the format of the support; and the use of volunteers. A further 13 C-M-O configurations explained positive impact on mothers. These were based on receiving empathetic listening, acceptance, affirmation and normalisation; peers sharing ideas about self-care, coping, and services; peers using therapeutic techniques; the opportunity to give support to others; meaningful social relationships with volunteers and other mothers; and other benefits of attending a group. There were 8 C-M-O configurations explaining negative impact. These were based on lack of validation; self-criticism from downward and upward social comparison; a culture of negativity; peers being judgemental or directive; not feeling heard; peer support as a stressful social relationship; and distress at endings. Conclusions: Peer support works in complex ways that are affected by personal and social contexts. Providers, commissioners and evaluators can use this review to understand and maximise the valuable benefits of peer support, to minimise potential risks, and to devise ways of reaching mothers who do not currently engage with it.

References Powered by Scopus

A Theory of Social Comparison Processes

13136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis

11717Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health

2637Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

World Psychiatric Association-Asian Journal of Psychiatry Commission on Public Mental Health

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Depression in New Mothers, Volume 2: Screening, Assessment, and Treatment Alternatives: Fourth Edition

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a culturally adapted nonspecialist delivery Problem-Solving Therapy: Friendship Bench Intervention for perinatal psychological distress in Sierra Leone

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McLeish, J., Ayers, S., & McCourt, C. (2023). Community-based perinatal mental health peer support: a realist review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05843-8

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 15

52%

Psychology 10

34%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

10%

Computer Science 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free