Musicians have better memory than nonmusicians: A meta-analysis

101Citations
Citations of this article
242Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Several studies have found that musicians perform better than nonmusicians in memory tasks, but this is not always the case, and the strength of this apparent advantage is unknown. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis with the aim of clarifying whether musicians perform better than nonmusicians in memory tasks. Methods: Education Source; PEP (WEB)—Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing; Psychology and Behavioral Science (EBSCO); PsycINFO (Ovid); PubMed; ScienceDirect—AllBooks Content (Elsevier API); SCOPUS (Elsevier API); SocINDEX with Full Text (EBSCO) and Google Scholar were searched for eligible studies. The selected studies involved two groups of participants: young adult musicians and nonmusicians. All the studies included memory tasks (loading long-term, short-term or working memory) that contained tonal, verbal or visuospatial stimuli. Three meta-analyses were run separately for long-term memory, short-term memory and working memory. Results: We collected 29 studies, including 53 memory tasks. The results showed that musicians performed better than nonmusicians in terms of long-term memory, g = .29, 95% CI (.08–.51), short-term memory, g = .57, 95% CI (.41–.73), and working memory, g = .56, 95% CI (.33–.80). To further explore the data, we included a moderator (the type of stimulus presented, i.e., tonal, verbal or visuospatial), which was found to influence the effect size for short-term and working memory, but not for long-term memory. In terms of short-term and working memory, the musicians’ advantage was large with tonal stimuli, moderate with verbal stimuli, and small or null with visuospatial stimuli. Conclusions: The three meta-analyses revealed a small effect size for long-term memory, and a medium effect size for short-term and working memory, suggesting that musicians perform better than nonmusicians in memory tasks. Moreover, the effect of the moderator suggested that, the type of stimuli influences this advantage.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

48716Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

22347Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introduction to Meta-Analysis

14539Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cognitive Training Does Not Enhance General Cognition

191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Musical practice as an enhancer of cognitive function in healthy aging - A systematic review and meta-analysis

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Links Between the Neurobiology of Oxytocin and Human Musicality

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Talamini, F., Altoè, G., Carretti, B., & Grassi, M. (2017). Musicians have better memory than nonmusicians: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186773

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 90

63%

Researcher 29

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 75

58%

Neuroscience 29

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 15

12%

Arts and Humanities 11

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 4
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 199

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free