What research tells us about knowledge transfer strategies to improve public health in low-income countries: a scoping review

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
124Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: This study describes the current state of research on knowledge transfer strategies to improve public health in low-income countries, to identify the knowledge gaps on this topic. Methods: In this scoping review, a descriptive and systematic process was used to analyse, for each article retained, descriptions of research context and methods, types of knowledge transfer activities and results reported. Results: 28 articles were analysed. They dealt with the evaluation of transfer strategies that employed multiple activities, mostly targeting health professionals and women with very young children. Most often these studies used quantitative designs and measurements of instrumental use with some methodological shortcomings. Results were positive and suggested recommendations for improving professional practices, knowledge and health-related behaviours. The review highlights the great diversity of transfer strategies used, strategies and many conditions for knowledge use. Conclusions: The review provides specific elements for understanding the transfer processes in low-income countries and highlights the need for systematic evaluation of the conditions for research results utilization.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siron, S., Dagenais, C., & Ridde, V. (2015, August 23). What research tells us about knowledge transfer strategies to improve public health in low-income countries: a scoping review. International Journal of Public Health. Birkhauser Verlag AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0716-5

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 44

61%

Researcher 19

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 22

36%

Medicine and Dentistry 17

28%

Nursing and Health Professions 14

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 8

13%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 51

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0