Not too big, not too small… Complexities of fixed-domain reasoning in first-order and description logics

4Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We consider reasoning problems in description logics and variants of first-order logic under the fixed-domain semantics, where the model size is finite and explicitly given. It follows from previous results that standard reasoning is NP-complete for a very wide range of logics, if the domain size is given in unary encoding. In this paper, we complete the complexity overview for unary encoding and investigate the effects of binary encoding with partially surprising results. Most notably, fixed-domain standard reasoning becomes NExpTime for the rather low-level description logics εLI and εLF (as opposed to ExpTime when no domain size is given). On the other hand, fixed-domain reasoning remains NExpTime even for first-order logic, which is undecidable under the unconstrained semantics. For less expressive logics, we establish a generic criterion ensuring NP-completeness of fixed-domain reasoning. Amongst other logics, this criterion captures all the tractable profiles of OWL 2.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rudolph, S., & Schweizer, L. (2017). Not too big, not too small… Complexities of fixed-domain reasoning in first-order and description logics. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10423 LNAI, pp. 695–708). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65340-2_57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free