SURG-06. THE SAFETY PROFILE OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS; 200 KHZ) CONCOMITANT WITH VENTRICULO-PERITONEAL SHUNTS IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA AND HYDROCEPHALUS

  • Oberheim-Bush N
  • Shi W
  • McDermott M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hydrocephalus is a common development in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) requiring treatment with ventriculo-peritoneal (VP)-shunts (programmable/non-programmable). To maximize outcomes in this high-risk population, evaluation of VP-shunt usage concomitant with GBM treatments is necessary. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields; 200 kHz; anti-mitotic, loco-regional cancer modality) non-invasively delivers continuous, alternating electrical fields per scalp-placed arrays. TTFields treatment has obtained FDA-approval/CE-mark in adult patients with newly-diagnosed GBM (ndGBM) and recurrent GBM (rGBM). Due to insufficient TTFields/VP-shunt usage data, label does not currently advise concurrent use. We report on safety data from adult patients utilizing TTFields/VP-shunts in the real-world, clinical-setting. METHOD(S): This retrospective, post-marketing, safety surveillance analysis evaluated unsolicited data from adult patients with GBM/hydrocephalus who were TTFields-treated in the presence of a VP-shunt. Available data from >18,000 patients with GBM prescribed TTFields (November 1, 2012 to April 15, 2021 [cut-off date]) were screened for eligibility. Included were 156 adult patients (>= 18 years of age) with confirmed GBM/hydrocephalus and TTFields/VP-shunt (46 programmable; 110 non-programmable/unknown) usage. Patients were further analyzed by diagnosis (ndGBM, n=92; rGBM, n=64). RESULT(S): Of 156 TTFields/VP-shunt-treated patients (median age 52), 66% were male and 81% from the United States (19%; Europe/ Middle-east/Africa). Overall, no TTFields-related shunt-failures or differences by GBM diagnosis in shunt-type and TTFields-related AEs were observed. Commonly-reported TTFields-related adverse events (AEs) >10% were beneath-array skin reactions (~43%), electric sensations (~14%; tingling), headache (~13%), fatigue/malaise (~12%), and heat sensation (~11%; warmth); headache and fatigue/malaise are also associated with other concomitant treatments/disease burden. There were 5 serious AEs (all skin AEs) potentially-related to TTFields at the shunt-site (2 events, wound dehiscence; 3 events, skin erosion). CONCLUSION(S): Adult patients with GBM/hydrocephalus treated with TTFields (200 kHz)/VP-shunts in the realworld, clinical-setting suggests feasibility and a tolerable safety profile; with no evidence of disrupted VP-shunt effectiveness. TTFields safety profile was consistent with prior-studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oberheim-Bush, N. A., Shi, W., McDermott, M., Grote, A., Stindl, J., & Lustgarten, L. (2021). SURG-06. THE SAFETY PROFILE OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS; 200 KHZ) CONCOMITANT WITH VENTRICULO-PERITONEAL SHUNTS IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA AND HYDROCEPHALUS. Neuro-Oncology, 23(Supplement_6), vi196–vi196. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab196.776

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free