Hypnotics. Drug selection by means of the system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA) method

6Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Selection of hypnotics for drug formularies in The Netherlands, France and the UK is made by means of the System of objectified Judgement Analysis (SOJA) method. The following criteria are included in the method: clinical efficacy (maximal 300 points), adverse effects (250 points), clinical documentation (150 points), cost (120 points), pharmacokinetic properties (80 points), toxicity (50 points), drug interactions (30 points) and the number of tablet strengths available (20 points). In all 3 countries, zolpidem, zopiclone and temazepam showed the highest score, followed by lormetazepam. High scores favour inclusion in formularies. Nitrazepam and loprazolam scored 75 to 130 points less than the top 3, and flunitrazepam shows the lowest score (119 to 183 paints less than zolpidem, zopiclone and temazepam). Therefore, the first 3 (or 4) hypnotics are most suitable for formulary inclusion while the others are not.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janknegt, R., Van Der Kuy, A., Declerck, G., & Idzikowski, C. (1996). Hypnotics. Drug selection by means of the system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA) method. PharmacoEconomics, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199610020-00007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free