Critical care at the end of life: Balancing technology with compassion and agreeing when to stop

12Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Modern intensive care saves lives. However, the substantial related financial costs are, for many, married to substantial costs in terms of suffering. In the most sick, the experience of intensive care is commonly associated with the development of profound physical debility, which may last years after discharge. Likewise, the negative psychological impact commonly experienced by such patients during their care is now widely recognized, as is the persistence of psychological morbidity. Such issues become increasingly important as the population of the frail elderly increases, and the health and social care services face budgetary restriction. Efforts must be made to humanize intensive care as much as possible. Meanwhile, an open conversation must be held between those within the medical professions, and between such healthcare workers and the public in general, regarding the balancing of the positive and negative impacts of intensive care. Such conversations should extend to individual patients and their families when considering what care is genuinely in their best interests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montgomery, H., Grocott, M., & Mythen, M. (2017). Critical care at the end of life: Balancing technology with compassion and agreeing when to stop. In British Journal of Anaesthesia (Vol. 119, pp. i85–i89). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex324

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free