Sparse unbiased analysis of anatomical variance in longitudinal imaging

21Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a new algorithm for reliable, unbiased, multivariate longitudinal analysis of cortical and white matter atrophy rates with penalized statistical methods. The pipeline uses a step-wise approach to transform and personalize template information first to a single-subject template (SST) and then to the individual's time series data. The first stream of information flows from group template to the SST; the second flows from the SST to the individual time-points and provides unbiased, prior-based segmentation and measurement of cortical thickness. MRI-bias correction, consistent longitudinal segmentation, cortical parcellation and cortical thickness estimation are all based on strong use of the subject-specific priors built from initial diffeomorphic mapping between the SST and optimal group template. We evaluate our approach with both test-retest data and with application to a driving biological problem. We use test-retest data to show that this approach produces (a) zero change when the retest data contains the same image content as the test data and (b) produces normally distributed, low variance estimates of thickness change centered at zero when test-retest data is collected near in time to test data. We also show that our approach-when combined with sparse canonical correlation analysis-reveals plausible, significant, annualized decline in cortical thickness and white matter volume when contrasting frontotemporal dementia and normal aging. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Avants, B., Cook, P. A., McMillan, C., Grossman, M., Tustison, N. J., Zheng, Y., & Gee, J. C. (2010). Sparse unbiased analysis of anatomical variance in longitudinal imaging. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6361 LNCS, pp. 324–331). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15705-9_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free