A randomized controlled pilot study of artesunate versus triclabendazole for human fascioliasis in central Vietnam

64Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Human fascioliasis caused by Fasciola hepatica or Fasciola gigantica is an increasing global problem. The mainstay of current treatment is triclabendazole, but resistance in animals has been described, and it is not available in many countries. The antimalarial artesunate has an excellent safety profile, and there is increasing evidence of its efficacy against other parasites both in vitro and in vivo. We performed a study to investigate the usefulness of artesunate in symptomatic human fascioliasis; 100 patients were enrolled. Patients treated with artesunate were significantly more likely to be free of abdominal pain at hospital discharge (50/50 versus 44/50, P = 0.027, relative risk 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.26), but the complete response rate at 3 months was lower than for patients treated with triclabendazole (38/50 versus 46/50, P = 0.05, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.98, artesunate versus triclabendazole). There may be a role for artesunate in fascioliasis. Copyright © 2008 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tran, T. H., Ng, T. T., Nguyen, H. M., Hoang, D. D., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, T. H., … Day, J. N. (2008). A randomized controlled pilot study of artesunate versus triclabendazole for human fascioliasis in central Vietnam. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 78(3), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2008.78.388

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free