Learning for life: ESD, ecopedagogy and the new spirit of capitalism

10Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

More than a decade ago, critical ecopedagogue Richard Kahn expressed his fears and hopes regarding Education for sustainable development (ESD). He feared that ESD would be short lived and marginalized and would develop an instrumental pedagogy of one-sided transmission of knowledge, yet hoped for ESD to encompass three types of “ecoliteracies”: technical/functional, cultural and critical. After an assessment of current ESD, as reported by UNESCO, this paper concludes that his two first fears were unfounded, while his hopes regarding ESD’s pedagogical content were largely not met. To better understand the result, Luc Boltanski’s and Éve Chiapello’s analysis of “the new spirit of capitalism” is mobilized. According to it, current capitalism integrates “artistic critique” on e.g., lack of autonomy and creativity with greater ease than “social critique” with respect to e.g., poverty and inequality. This might explain what ecoliteracies that are integrated into ESD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hjorth Warlenius, R. (2022). Learning for life: ESD, ecopedagogy and the new spirit of capitalism. Journal of Environmental Education, 53(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2022.2070102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free