Reliability of the Tibial Tubercle–Roman Arch Distance for Evaluating Tibial Tubercle Malposition and Predicting Patellar Dislocation via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

8Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The tibial tubercle (TT)–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance has low reproducibility in patients with a dysplastic trochlea, whereas the clinical value of the TT–posterior cruciate ligament (TT-PCL) distance remains controversial. Purposes: To establish a method to assess the position of the TT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using the TT–Roman arch (TT-RA) distance, compare this method with the TT-TG and TT-PCL distance, and provide the pathological threshold value of the TT-RA distance in patients with patellar dislocation. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The TT-RA distance, TT-TG distance, and TT-PCL distance were measured on MRI scans in 70 patients with a history of patellar dislocation and 70 healthy individuals. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of each measurement parameter were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity and the interrelationship of the 3 measurement parameters were investigated using Pearson correlation and the receiver operating characteristic curve. The pathological threshold values of these measurements were calculated according to the data of healthy individuals. Finally, logistic regression analysis was performed using these values. Results: Patients with patellar dislocation had a greater TT-RA distance compared with healthy individuals (18.05 ± 4.16 vs 13.86 ± 2.90 mm; P 0.90). The inter- and intraobserver ICCs of the TT-TG distance measurements were extremely low for Dejour type D dysplasia (ICC, 0.509 and 0.616, respectively). The pathological TT-RA distance threshold was calculated as 19.5 mm. Logistic regression showed that patients with a TT-RA distance >19.5 mm were 11.7 times more likely to sustain patellar dislocation than were those with TT-RA distance less than this value. Conclusion: The TT-RA distance was a more reliable parameter with which to evaluate TT position than was TT-TG distance in patients with trochlear dysplasia. The TT-PCL distance was the least reliable among the 3 parameters studied.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, Z., Zhao, P., Song, Y., Wang, H., Zhou, A., & Yu, J. K. (2022). Reliability of the Tibial Tubercle–Roman Arch Distance for Evaluating Tibial Tubercle Malposition and Predicting Patellar Dislocation via Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221118561

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free