Facilitators and barriers to uptake of an extended seasonal malaria chemoprevention programme in Ghana: A qualitative study of caregivers and community health workers

22Citations
Citations of this article
260Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention (SMC) is currently recommended for children under five in areas where malaria transmission is highly seasonal. We explored children's caregivers' and community health workers' (CHWs) responses to an extended 5-month SMC programme. Methods: Thirteen in-depth interviews and eight focus group discussions explored optimal and suboptimal 'uptake' of SMC to examine facilitators and barriers to caregivers' uptake. Results: There did not appear to be major differences between caregivers of children with optimal and sub-optimal SMC uptake in terms of their knowledge of malaria, their perceptions of the effect of SMC on a child's health, nor their understanding of chemoprevention. Caregivers experienced difficulty in prioritising SMC for well children, perceiving medication being for treatment rather than prevention. Prior to the study, caregivers had become accustomed to rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) for malaria, and therefore blood testing for malaria during the baseline survey at the start of the SMC programme may have positively influenced uptake. Facilitators of uptake included caregivers' trust in and respect for administrators of SMC (including CHWs), access to medication and supportive (family) networks. Barriers to uptake related to poor communication of timings of community gatherings, travel distances, absence during SMC home deliveries, and limited demand for SMC due to lack of previous experience. Future delivery of SMC by trained CHWs would be acceptable to caregivers. Conclusion: A combination of caregivers' physical access to SMC medication, the drug regimen, trust in the medical profession and perceived norms around malaria prevention all likely influenced caregivers' level of uptake. SMC programmes need to consider: 1) developing supportive, accessible and flexible modes of drug administration including home delivery and village community kiosks; 2) improving demand for preventive medication including the harnessing of learnt trust; and 3) developing community-based networks for users to support optimal uptake of SMC.

Figures

  • Table 1. Female caregivers and community health workers who took part in In-Depth Interviews or Focus Group Discussions.
  • Table 2. Results of the coding and framework analysis.
  • Table 2. (Continued)
  • Table 3. Summary of faciltators and barriers to SMC uptake amongst caregiver respondents, collected during a qualitative study in Ghana in January 2013.

References Powered by Scopus

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

6462Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Partnerships with patients: The pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making

395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making

263Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Factors enabling community health workers and volunteers to overcome socio-cultural barriers to behaviour change: Meta-synthesis using the concept of social capital

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preventing malaria in the Peruvian Amazon: A qualitative study in Iquitos, Peru

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Post-discharge malaria chemoprevention (PMC) in Malawi: Caregivers' acceptance and preferences with regard to delivery methods

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Antwi, G. D., Bates, L. A., King, R., Mahama, P. R., Tagbor, H., Cairns, M., & Newell, J. N. (2016). Facilitators and barriers to uptake of an extended seasonal malaria chemoprevention programme in Ghana: A qualitative study of caregivers and community health workers. PLoS ONE, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166951

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 82

67%

Researcher 29

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 50

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 48

42%

Social Sciences 10

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0