Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy - A New Equilibrium?

  • Floridi L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper examines the current debate on the right to be forgotten in connection with three different issues that revolve around: (i) the construction of individual identities; (ii) how individual and collective memories are intertwined; and, (iii) different forms of oblivion vis-à-vis the idea of forgiveness. The aim is to offer a normative stance in terms of “fair memory” and “difficult forgiveness.” From a philosophical viewpoint, attention is drawn to the dual status of the past, i.e., that which is not any longer and what Paul Ricoeur used to call the “existent state.” From a legal perspective, focus is on how to strike a balance between the subjective claim to be forgotten and further rights of the legal system. From a political outlook, what is at stake concerns the mediation between the relational structure of the law and the inter-subjective nature of forgiveness. Today’s debate has to match up with all these aspects of the right to be forgotten.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Floridi, L. (2014). Protection of Information and the Right to Privacy - A New Equilibrium? Springer, 17(i), 17–27. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-05720-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free