Positive and negative politeness in spoken lithuanian

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of the research is to discuss the means of expression of positive and negative politeness in prepared and spontaneous spoken language. The research is based on the speech-act theory by Searle (1976) and the theory of positive and negative politeness by Brown and Levinson (1978, 2009). The research data are conversations from the Corpus of Spoken Lithuanian, which comprise semi-formal and formal communication in the media, academic discourse, and spontaneous communication in service domains. In total, the research data consist of 144,893 words. The research demonstrates that different politeness strategies are employed in different spoken language registers.

References Powered by Scopus

A classification of illocutionary acts

1546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP)

669Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characteristics of request formulation in Estonian, Finnish, French, Lithuanian and Russian

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Face-threatening and Face-saving Speech Acts of Teachers: A Discourse Analysis of Classroom Interactions

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Politeness speech acts in the speech of children: Pragmatic mistakes and acquisition

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Speaker stance and engagement across disciplines in Lithuanian university lectures: the case of mes ‘we’ in medicine and business administration

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kamandulyte-Merfeldiene, L., & Vainilavičiute, S. (2018). Positive and negative politeness in spoken lithuanian. Philologia Estonica Tallinnensis. Tallinn University. https://doi.org/10.22601/PET.2018.03.03

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 5

83%

Arts and Humanities 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free