Culprit-only versus staged complete revascularization for patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction and Multivessel disease: A retrospective cohort study

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Multivessel disease (MVD) is common in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but optimal treatment management remains undetermined. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 602 consecutive STEMI patients with MVD were enrolled between January 1, 2010 and October 1, 2014. Three hundred and eighty-two patients underwent culprit-only revascularization and 220 underwent staged complete revascularization. Primary end points were a composite of cardiac mortality or nonfatal reinfarction. Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 35 months (12-71 months). Following multivariate analysis, staged complete revascularization was associated with a lower rate of the composite of cardiac mortality or nonfatal reinfarction [HR: 0.430, 95 % CI: 0.197-0.940, P = 0.034] and unplanned repeat revascularization [HR: 0.343, 95 % CI: 0.166-0.708, P = 0.004] compared with culprit-only revascularization. Conclusions: Compared with culprit-only revascularization, staged complete revascularization significantly reduced the rate of the composite of cardiac mortality or nonfatal reinfarction, and the need for unplanned repeat revascularization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, T., Dong, Y., Zhu, J., Tian, C., Sun, Z., & Sun, Z. (2016). Culprit-only versus staged complete revascularization for patients with STsegment elevation myocardial infarction and Multivessel disease: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0365-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free