Enabling Robust Grammatical Error Correction in New Domains: Data Sets, Metrics, and Analyses

29Citations
Citations of this article
118Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Until now, grammatical error correction (GEC) has been primarily evaluated on text written by non-native English speakers, with a focus on student essays. This paper enables GEC development on text written by native speakers by providing a new data set and metric. We present a multiple-reference test corpus for GEC that includes 4,000 sentences in two new domains (formal and informal writing by native English speakers) and 2,000 sentences from a diverse set of non-native student writing. We also collect human judgments of several GEC systems on this new test set and perform a meta-evaluation, assessing how reliable automatic metrics are across these domains. We find that commonly used GEC metrics have inconsistent performance across domains, and therefore we propose a new ensemble metric that is robust on all three domains of text.

References Powered by Scopus

Convolutional sequence to sequence learning

2119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CoNLL-2014 shared task on grammatical error correction

434Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automatic annotation and evaluation of error types for grammatical error correction

241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

MuCGEC: a Multi-Reference Multi-Source Evaluation Dataset for Chinese Grammatical Error Correction

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving Readability for Automatic Speech Recognition Transcription

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Napoles, C., Nădejde, M., & Tetreault, J. (2019). Enabling Robust Grammatical Error Correction in New Domains: Data Sets, Metrics, and Analyses. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7, 551–566. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00282

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

72%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

11%

Researcher 4

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 30

70%

Linguistics 7

16%

Social Sciences 4

9%

Engineering 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0