Field techniques for measuring bedrock erosion and denudation

31Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bedrock erosion rates in natural landscapes are usually slow, of the order of millimeters per year or less, and sophisticated techniques have been developed to measure them. Different techniques have proved to be valuable depending on the spatial and temporal scale on which information is needed, on the environment and on the scientific question that is asked. Here, we give an overview of the various methods that have been developed. We introduce their working principles and outline their advantages and disadvantages. Further, we provide comprehensive references to relevant literature, both on the methods and on scientific examples of their application. © 2016 The Authors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Power-law distributions in empirical data

6957Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Terrestrial in situ cosmogenic nuclides: Theory and application

1721Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas

1072Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Spatial patterns of erosion in a bedrock gorge

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Land-surface parameters for spatial predictive mapping and modeling

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Centennial- to millennial-scale hard rock erosion rates deduced from luminescence-depth profiles

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turowski, J. M., & Cook, K. L. (2017). Field techniques for measuring bedrock erosion and denudation. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4007

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

54%

Researcher 18

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 42

66%

Engineering 12

19%

Environmental Science 8

13%

Social Sciences 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0