Advancing Rheumatology Care Through Machine Learning

7Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rheumatologic diseases are marked by their complexity, involving immune-, metabolic- and mechanically mediated processes which can affect different organ systems. Despite a growing arsenal of targeted medications, many rheumatology patients fail to achieve full remission. Assessing disease activity remains challenging, as patients prioritize different symptoms and disease phenotypes vary. This is also reflected in clinical trials where the efficacy of drugs is not necessarily measured in an optimal way with the traditional outcome assessment. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed a digital transformation in healthcare, embracing telemonitoring and patient-reported data via apps and wearables. As a further driver of digital medicine, electronic medical record (EMR) providers are actively engaged in developing algorithms for clinical decision support, heralding a shift towards patient-centered, decentralized care. Machine learning algorithms have emerged as valuable tools for handling the increasing volume of patient data, promising to enhance treatment quality and patient well-being. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are particularly promising for radiological image analysis, aiding in the detection of specific lesions such as erosions, sacroiliitis, or osteoarthritis, with several FDA-approved applications. Clinical predictions, including numerical disease activity forecasts and medication choices, offer the potential to optimize treatment strategies. Numeric predictions can be integrated into clinical workflows, allowing for shared decision making with patients. Clustering patients based on disease characteristics provides a personalized care approach. Digital biomarkers, such as patient-reported outcomes and wearables data, offer insights into disease progression and therapy response more flexibly and outside patient consultations. In association with patient-reported outcomes, disease-specific digital biomarkers via image recognition or single-camera motion capture enables more efficient remote patient monitoring. Digital biomarkers may also play a major role in clinical trials in the future as continuous, disease-specific outcome measurement facilitating decentralized studies. Prediction models can help with patient selection in clinical trials, such as by predicting high disease activity. Efforts are underway to integrate these advancements into clinical workflows using digital pathways and remote patient monitoring platforms. In summary, machine learning, digital biomarkers, and advanced imaging technologies hold immense promise for enhancing clinical decision support and clinical trials in rheumatology. Effective integration will require a multidisciplinary approach and continued validation through prospective studies.

References Powered by Scopus

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update

2102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cytokine networks in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis

398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transfer learning techniques for medical image analysis: A review

292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Artificial intelligence in rheumatology research: what is it good for?

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic cross-domain transfer learning for driver fatigue monitoring: multi-modal sensor fusion with adaptive real-time personalizations

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: A transformative perspective

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hügle, T. (2024). Advancing Rheumatology Care Through Machine Learning. Pharmaceutical Medicine, 38(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-024-00515-0

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

33%

Computer Science 4

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

20%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free