Subliminally and supraliminally acquired long-term memories jointly bias delayed decisions

5Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Common wisdom and scientific evidence suggest that good decisions require conscious deliberation. But growing evidence demonstrates that not only conscious but also unconscious thoughts influence decision-making. Here, we hypothesize that both consciously and unconsciously acquired memories guide decisions. Our experiment measured the influence of subliminally and supraliminally presented information on delayed (30-40 min) decision-making. Participants were presented with subliminal pairs of faces and written occupations for unconscious encoding. Following a delay of 20 min, participants consciously (re-)encoded the same faces now presented supraliminally along with either the same written occupations, occupations congruous to the subliminally presented occupations (same wage-category), or incongruous occupations (opposite wage-category). To measure decision-making, participants viewed the same faces again (with occupations absent) and decided on the putative income of each person: low, low-average, high-average, or high. Participants were encouraged to decide spontaneously and intuitively. Hence, the decision task was an implicit or indirect test of relational memory. If conscious thought alone guided decisions (= H0), supraliminal information should determine decision outcomes independently of the encoded subliminal information. This was, however, not the case. Instead, both unconsciously and consciously encoded memories influenced decisions: identical unconscious and conscious memories exerted the strongest bias on income decisions, while both incongruous and congruous (i.e., non-identical) subliminally and supraliminally formed memories canceled each other out leaving no bias on decisions. Importantly, the increased decision bias following the formation of identical unconscious and conscious memories and the reduced decision bias following to the formation of non-identical memories were determined relative to a control condition, where conscious memory formation alone could influence decisions. In view of the much weaker representational strength of subliminally vs. supraliminally formed memories, their long-lasting impact on decision-making is noteworthy.

References Powered by Scopus

A behavioral model of rational choice

9033Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms

4035Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Perspective on Judgment and Choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality

3945Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Larger capacity for unconscious versus conscious episodic memory

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Unconscious integration: Current evidence for integrative processing under subliminal conditions

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conscious awareness and memory systems in the brain

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruch, S., Herbert, E., & Henke, K. (2017). Subliminally and supraliminally acquired long-term memories jointly bias delayed decisions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01542

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

91%

Researcher 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 14

56%

Neuroscience 6

24%

Computer Science 3

12%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 74

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free