Patterns of taxonomic diversity among terrestrial isopods

91Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The publication of the world catalog of terrestrial isopods some ten years ago by Schmalfuss has facilitated research on isopod diversity patterns at a global scale. Furthermore, even though we still lack a comprehensive and robust phylogeny of Oniscidea, we do have some useful approaches to phylogenetic relationships among major clades which can offer additional insights into isopod evolutionary dynamics. Taxonomic diversity is one of many approaches to biodiversity and, despite its sensitiveness to biases in taxonomic practice, has proved useful in exploring diversification dynamics of various taxa. In the present work, we attempt an analysis of taxonomic diversity patterns among Oniscidea based on an updated world list of species containing 3,710 species belonging to 527 genera and 37 families (data till April 2014). The analysis explores species diversity at the genus and family level, as well as the relationships between species per genera, species per families, and genera per families. In addition, we consider the structure of isopod taxonomic system under the fractal perspective that has been proposed as a measure of a taxon’s diversification. Finally, we check whether there is any phylogenetic signal behind taxonomic diversity patterns. The results can be useful in a more detailed elaboration of Oniscidea systematics.

Figures

  • Table 1. List of families with their respective numbers of genera and species, the latter separately for those in known genera and those of uncertain generic assignment.
  • Figure 1. Rate of isopod species description since 1750. A Number of terrestrial isopod species described per decade B Cumulative species number of terrestrial isopods per decade, since 1750.
  • Figure 2. Skewness in the distribution of taxonomic richness with results of the respective Shapiro-Wilks tests. A for number of genera per families B for number of species per genera, and C for number of species per families.
  • Figure 3. Regression of species richness per higher taxonomic groups against richness of genera per families (all in logarithmic values). A species per genera B species per family.
  • Figure 4. Linear regression of the frequency of genera (fGenera) against their respective species richness, revealing the fractal nature of terrestrial isopod taxonomy. The slope of the regression (1.14) gives the fractal dimension. Unit frequency values – genera with unique values of species richness – have been excluded in order to avoid a long queue of zeros that smoothens the slope only due to the fact that the size of large genera is more probable to be unique.
  • Figure 5. The species richness of Oniscidea families against two phylogenetic hypotheses. A Tree from Mattern and Schlegel (2001) incorporating also hypotheses from Erhard (1998) B tree for Crinocheta from Schmidt (2008).

References Powered by Scopus

Flies and flowers: Taxonomic diversity of anthophiles and pollinators

356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current status of the myriapod class diplopoda (millipedes): Taxonomic diversity and phylogeny

167Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global Taxonomic Diversity of Living Reptiles

153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Genetic evidence against monophyly of Oniscidea implies a need to revise scenarios for the origin of terrestrial isopods

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An evolutionary timescale for terrestrial isopods and a lack of molecular support for the monophyly of Oniscidea (Crustacea: Isopoda)

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diversity and evolution of sex determination systems in terrestrial isopods

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sfenthourakis, S., & Taiti, S. (2015). Patterns of taxonomic diversity among terrestrial isopods. ZooKeys, 2015(515), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.515.9332

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

57%

Researcher 7

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24

77%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

10%

Environmental Science 3

10%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 33

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0