In the Name of Morality

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Annotation There is presumably a trend toward depoliticization of character education as character educators claim to teach universal values and engage in community-based decision making. However, as Tianlong Yu argues in this book, under the umbrella of universality, character educators define virtues based on neo-conservative ideologies. In the name of community, they trivialize issues of gender, race, class, and culture and promote the interests of dominant social groups. In the Name of Morality: Character Education and Political Control traces the historical origins of character education and stimulates readers to look critically into the social interests, power relations, and political agendas that have shaped the character education movement in the United States. This challenging, yet engaging, book reaffirms the crucial relationship between moral education and politics. It is a must-read for anyone who is concerned about students' character building and moral education in schools. Ideology, politics, and moral education : a cross-cultural inquiry -- The early character education movement : a historical perspective -- Moral decline and the politicization of character education -- Character education in theory : moral philosophies and ideologies -- Character education in practice : linkages to ideologies -- Back to the future : alternative approaches to character education and school reform.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

In the Name of Morality. (2007). In The Limits of Idealism (pp. 23–44). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29601-2_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free