A comprehensive risk assessment framework for synchrophasor communication networks in a smart grid cyber physical system with a case study

14Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The smart grid (SG), which has revolutionized the power grid, is being further improved by using the burgeoning cyber physical system (CPS) technology. The conceptualization of SG using CPS, which is referred to as the smart grid cyber physical system (SGCPS), has gained a momentum with the synchrophasor measurements. The edifice of the synchrophasor system is its communication network referred to as a synchrophasor communication network (SCN), which is used to com-municate the synchrophasor data from the sensors known as phasor measurement units (PMUs) to the control center known as the phasor data concentrator (PDC). However, the SCN is vulnerable to hardware and software failures that introduce risk. Thus, an appropriate risk assessment framework for the SCN is needed to alleviate the risk in the protection and control of the SGCPS. In this direction, a comprehensive risk assessment framework has been proposed in this article for three types of SCNs, namely: dedicated SCN, shared SCN and hybrid SCN in an SGCPS. The proposed framework uses hardware reliability as well as data reliability to evaluate the associated risk. A simplified hardware reliability model has been proposed for each of these networks, based on fail-ure probability to assess risk associated with hardware failures. Furthermore, the packet delivery ratio (PDR) metric is considered for measuring risk associated with data reliability. To mimic practical shared and hybrid SCNs, the risk associated with data reliability is evaluated for different background traffics of 70%, 80% and 95% using 64 Kbps and 300 Kbps PMU data rates. The analyt-ical results are meticulously validated by considering a case study of West Bengal’s (a state in India) power grid. With respect to the case study, different SCNs are designed and simulated using the QualNet network simulator. The simulations are performed for dedicated SCN, shared SCN and hybrid SCN with 64 Kbps and 300 Kbps PMU data rates. The simulation results are comprehen-sively analyzed for risk hedging of the proposed SCNs with data reliability and hardware reliability. To summarize, the mean risk with data reliability (RwDR) as compared to the mean risk with hardware reliability (RwHR) increases in shared SCN and hybrid SCN by a factor of 17.108 and 23.278, respectively. However, minimum RwDR increases in shared and hybrid SCN by a factor of 16.005 and 17.717, respectively, as compared to the corresponding minimum RwHR. The overall analysis reveals that the RwDR is minimum for dedicated SCN, moderate for shared SCN, and highest for hybrid SCN.

References Powered by Scopus

Smart Grids: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective

636Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Smart grid communications: Overview of research challenges, solutions, and standardization activities

512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Survey on Smart Grid Cyber-Physical System Testbeds

331Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Emerging technologies and design aspects of next generation cyber physical system with a smart city application perspective

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Blockchain-Enabled Smart Grid Applications: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Energy Management in Smart Grid 3.0

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jha, A. V., Appasani, B., Ghazali, A. N., & Bizon, N. (2021). A comprehensive risk assessment framework for synchrophasor communication networks in a smart grid cyber physical system with a case study. Energies, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123428

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 8

62%

Engineering 4

31%

Psychology 1

8%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0