Clinical factors within a week of birth influencing sodium level difference between an arterial blood gas analyzer and an autoanalyzer in VLBWIs: A retrospective study

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Neonatologists often experience sodium ion level difference between an arterial blood gas analyzer (direct method) and an autoanalyzer (indirect method) in critically ill neonates. We hypothesize that clinical factors besides albumin and protein in the blood that cause laboratory errors might be associated with sodium ion level difference between the 2 methods in very-low-birth-weight infants during early life after birth. Among very-low-birth-weight infants who were admitted to Jeonbuk National Hospital Neonatal Intensive Care Units from October 2013 to December 2016, 106 neonates were included in this study. Arterial blood sample was collected within an hour after birth. Blood gas analyzer and biochemistry autoanalyzer were performed simultaneously. Seventy-six (71.7%) were found to have sodium ion difference exceeding 4 mmol/L between 2 methods. The mean difference of sodium ion level was 5.9 ± 6.1 mmol/L, exceeding 4 mmol/L. Based on sodium ion level difference, patients were divided into >4 and ≤4 mmol/L groups. The sodium level difference >4 mmol/L group showed significantly (P 4 mmol/L between 2 methods. Thus, difference in sodium level between blood gas analyzer and biochemistry autoanalyzer in early stages of life could reflect maximum physiology weight loss. Based on this study, if the study to predict the body's composition of extracellular and intracellular fluid is proceeded, it will help neonatologist make clinical decisions at early life of preterm infants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H. H., & Kim, J. K. (2021). Clinical factors within a week of birth influencing sodium level difference between an arterial blood gas analyzer and an autoanalyzer in VLBWIs: A retrospective study. Medicine (United States), 100(49). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free