The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: A valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction

150Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The superior and inferior myocutaneous gluteal free flaps have been considered as valuable alternatives to the latissimus dorsi or TRAM flap since 1975. The superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap is the ultimate refinement of this myocutaneous flap as no gluteus maximus muscle is harvested. The flap is vascularised by one single perforator originating from the superior gluteal artery. This study summarises the prospectively gathered data on 20 free S-GAP flaps used for breast reconstruction in 16 patients. Immediate reconstruction was performed in six breasts and delayed in 14 breasts. Mean follow-up was 11.1 months. Two risk factors, Raynaud's disease and radiotherapy, were the cause of flap revision in two different patients. Total flap loss occurred in one case. Partial flap loss was not observed and a small area of fat necrosis was diagnosed by mammography in one other patient. All flaps were anastomosed to the internal mammary vessels at the 3rd costochondral junction. The anatomy of the sensate nerves of the S-CAP flap is described. Two nervous repairs provided early sensory recovery. The free S-GAP flap has become my personal second choice for autologous breast reconstruction after the DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) flap. The S-GAP flap is indicated in patients with an asthenic body habitus or with excessive abdominal scarring. The advantages are the abundance of adipose tissue in this area even in thin patients, a long vascular pedicle, a hidden scar, improved projection of the reconstructed breast compared to the DIEP and TRAM flaps and the preservation of the entire gluteus maximus muscle. The donor morbidity is extremely low.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Blondeel, P. N. (1999). The sensate free superior gluteal artery perforator (S-GAP) flap: A valuable alternative in autologous breast reconstruction. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 52(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1998.3032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free