Teacher Education for Literacy Teaching: Research at the Personal, Institutional, and Collective Levels

  • Kosnik C
  • Beck C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One of the complaints about teacher education is that research done on programs tends to be local and ends at the completion of the program. As Clift and Brady (2005) found in the American Educational Research Association (AERA) panel on research and teacher education, between 1995 and 2001 only 24 studies were conducted on preservice literacy courses. And only one “studies practice beyond student teaching: most studies were conducted over one semester, typically the student teaching semester.” Clift and Brady argued that “[t]he short-term nature of this research limits our ability to understand how teacher education methods courses and fieldwork lead to long-term professional growth” (2005, p. 317). The sole longitudinal study – that by Grossman et al. (2000) – concluded that it is necessary to connect the practices of beginning teachers with their teacher education program if we are to truly understand the practices of beginning teachers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2009). Teacher Education for Literacy Teaching: Research at the Personal, Institutional, and Collective Levels. In Research Methods for the Self-study of Practice (pp. 213–229). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9514-6_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free