Higher-primate phylogeny--why can't we decide?

35Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

At present, no definitive agreement on either the correct branching order or differential rates of evolution among the higher primates exists, despite the accumulated integration of decades of morphological, immunological, protein and nucleic acid sequence data, and numerous reasonable theoretical models for the analysis, interpretation, and understanding of those data. Of the three distinct unrooted phylogenetic trees, that joining human with chimpanzee and the gorilla with the orangutan is currently favored, but the two alternatives that group humans with either gorillas or the orangutan rather than with chimpanzees also have support. This paper is a synthetic and critical review of the methodological literature and isolates some 20 specific reasons why uncertainty in the evolutionary understanding of our closest living relatives persists. Many of the difficulties are eliminated or ameliorated by Lake's new methods of phylogenetic invariants and operator metrics. In the companion paper these new methods are used to analyze both the nuclear and mitochondrial DNA of the higher primates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holmquist, R., Miyamoto, M. M., & Goodman, M. (1988). Higher-primate phylogeny--why can’t we decide? Molecular Biology and Evolution, 5(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free