Watermarking is not cryptography

60Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A number of analogies to cryptographic concepts have been made about watermarking. In this paper, we argue that these analogies are misleading or incorrect, and highlight several analogies to support our argument. We believe that the fundamental role of watermarking is the reliable embedding and detection of information and should therefore be considered a form of communications. We note that the fields of communications and cryptography are quite distinct and while communications systems often combine technologies from the two fields, a layered architecture is applied that requires no knowledge of the layers above. We discuss how this layered approach can be applied to watermarking applications. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cox, I. J., Doërr, G., & Furon, T. (2006). Watermarking is not cryptography. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4283 LNCS, pp. 1–15). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11922841_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free