Induction and Analogy

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this final part of the book several rules of discovery are considered, that is, non-deductive rules for finding hypotheses to solve problems. Of course, finding hypotheses is not a sufficient condition for discovery. The latter requires hypotheses to be plausible, and the plausibility test procedure of Chapter 4 involves operations beyond simple hypothesis formation. Nevertheless, finding hypotheses is a necessary condition for discovery and, in that sense, one may speak of rules of discovery. The latter are not a closed set, given once for all, but rather an open set which can always be extended as research develops. Each such extension is a development of the analytic method, which grows as new non-deductive rules are added. As Bacon says, “the art of discovery may grow with discoveries.”

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cellucci, C. (2013). Induction and Analogy. In Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning (Vol. 1, pp. 331–346). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6091-2_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free