A tolerance rough set approach to clustering web search results

32Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Two most popular approaches to facilitate searching for information on the web are represented by web search engine and web directories. Although the performance of search engines is improving every day, searching on the web can be a tedious and time-consuming task due to the huge size and highly dynamic nature of the web. Moreover, the user's "intention behind the search" is not clearly expressed which results in too general, short queries. Results returned by search engine can count from hundreds to hundreds of thousands of documents. One approach to manage the large number of results is clustering. Search results clustering can be defined as a process of automatical grouping search results into to thematic groups. However, in contrast to traditional document clustering, clustering of search results are done on-the-fly (per user query request) and locally on a limited set of results return from the search engine. Clustering of search results can help user navigate through large set of documents more efficiently. By providing concise, accurate description of clusters, it lets user localizes interesting document faster. In this paper, we proposed an approach to search results clustering based on Tolerance Rough Set following the work on document clustering [4, 3]. Tolerance classes are used to approximate concepts existed in documents. The application of Tolerance Rough Set model in document lustering was proposed as a way to enrich document and cluster representation with the hope of increasing clustering performance. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ngo, C. L., & Nguyen, H. S. (2004). A tolerance rough set approach to clustering web search results. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3202, 515–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30116-5_51

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free