Glenn bidireccional: Resultados y análisis de factores de riesgo en una experiencia de 5 ãnos

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: Bidirectional Glenn shunt is a palliative surgical procedure in patients with single ventricle. Although morbimortality in this surgery is low, risk factors have been described. The purpose of this study is to report our outcomes in Glenn surgery, identifying mortality risk factors in our population. Methods: Retrospective study between 2005 and 2009. Age, weight, previous surgery, surgical procedure, and postoperative condition were analyzed. Results are reported as median and rank, or absolute values and percentage. Uni and multivariate analysis was made to identify risk factors of mortality and/or prolonged hospitalization (Stata 9.0). Results: One hundred and one patients were operated; 87 bidirectional Glenn and 14 bilateral Glenn. Median age 15 months (2.5-108), median weight 8.5 kg (4.2-27), and 74% of them with previous surgery. In 54 patients an associated procedure was performed simultaneously, only in 4 additional pulmonary blood flow was left. Median hospitalization was 8 days (2-97). Thirtyfive percent of the patients presented complications. No association between age, weight, pulmonary hypertension, cardiopulmonary bypass, cross clamping, associated procedures or Glenn bilateral with mortality or morbidity was found. Overall mortality was 3.9%. Conclusion: Mortality was similar to other centers, but morbidity in this group of patients is high. No independent risk factors associated with morbidity or mortality were identified. © 2012 Instituto Nacional de Cardiolog?a Ignacio Chávez. Published by Masson Doyma México S.A. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becerra, V., Moreno, G., Althabe, M., Lenz, A., Magliola, R., Martín, A., … Suárez, J. (2013). Glenn bidireccional: Resultados y análisis de factores de riesgo en una experiencia de 5 ãnos. Archivos de Cardiologia de Mexico, 83(2), 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acmx.2013.01.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free