Does the materiality of museum collections matter in digital humanities?

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

After more than one hundred years of increasingly self-rflective collecting museums aiid archives around the globe hold an immense corpus of physical objects aiid relevant archival material from the Sepik area of Papua New Guinea. While culturally coded kiioivledge is embodied in these materials, the use of additional outside observations may help to describe some of these areas ofknowledge. To keep traditional knowledge alive, methodologies beyoiid the reading of traditional texts, photographs, and sound recordings have to be developed and applied consistently The unusual complexity and high diversity of Sepik art makes developing new digital methods of storing studying ami sharing these resources a challenging task. Future museum activities are likely to put the original object into a new, focused light. Long overlooked aspects in the work of artists may thus come to the fore. By communicating with source communities and, at the end other end, with museum visitors, and by fostering research activities combining the context oriented approach of disciplines rooted in natural science and/or in the humanities, museums will redfiiie our views of Sepik art and culture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaufmann, C. (2018). Does the materiality of museum collections matter in digital humanities? Journal de La Societe Des Oceanistes. Societe des Oceanistes. https://doi.org/10.4000/jso.8376

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free