Student behavior in error-correction-tasks and its relation to perception of competence

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper investigates students' behavioral patterns within web-based multi-trial error-correction-tasks. By analyzing logfiles and considering students' initial perception of competence, we contribute to micro- as well as macro-adaption. We describe and visualize task processing data of 159 students, considering performance as well as attempts to solve a task. Taking preceeding behavior into account, it was possible to identify (maladaptive) behavioral patterns. Furthermore we compare the behavior of students with low vs. high perceptions of competence subsequent to a failure. In line with research regarding the influence of self-concept on performance and motivation, our findings suggest that students with a low perception of competence perform poorer and tend to skip trials more often after a failure, indicating motivational losses. Further research should build upon this study to enhance technology-based learning by designing learning environments and adaption strategies that take student behavior and prerequisites into account. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Narciss, S., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2011). Student behavior in error-correction-tasks and its relation to perception of competence. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6964 LNCS, pp. 370–383). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free