Developing mental health-care quality indicators: Toward a common framework

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Inconsistent performance measurement schemes hinder attempts to make international comparisons about mental health-care quality. This report describes a project undertaken by an international collaborative group that aims to develop a common framework of measures that will allow for international comparisons of mental health system performance. Design: Representatives from each country submitted reports of quality measurement initiatives in mental health. Indicators were reviewed, and all measurable indicators were compiled and organized. Sample: Twenty-nine programs from 11 countries and two cross-national programs submitted reports. Methods: Indicators were evaluated according to measurable inclusion criteria. Results: These methods yielded 656 total measures that were organized into 17 domains and 80 subdomains. Conclusions: No single program contained indicators in all domains, highlighting the need for a comprehensive, shared scheme for international measurement. By collecting and organizing measures through an inductive compilation of existing programs, the present study has generated a maximally inclusive basis for the creation of a common framework of international mental health quality indicators. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care; all rights reserved.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fisher, C. E., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Pincus, H. A., Brown, P., Rosen, A., Durbin, J., … Carroll, C. (2013). Developing mental health-care quality indicators: Toward a common framework. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 25(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs074

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

56%

Researcher 14

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

42%

Social Sciences 9

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

19%

Psychology 8

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free