The need for standardization in wildlife science: Home range estimators as an example

31Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Individual studies in wildlife science are indicative rather than conclusive. Although multiple studies can be meta-analyzed in such a way that scientific hypotheses can be tested, robust meta-analyses are often difficult or impossible if variables of interest are not measured in a uniform manner. We hypothesized that measurements, even of basic and unequivocal variables, are rarely standardized in wildlife sciences. We tested this assumption by reviewing randomly selected papers that describe the home range of mammals (n = 25) and birds (n = 25). In these papers, home ranges were calculated using 11 methods and 8 computer programs. The number of radiolocations used to calculate home ranges varied from 9 to >2,000. By estimating home ranges for two radiotelemetry data sets, we demonstrate that home ranges are not comparable if different methods are used and that estimates of home range are not standardized. We assume that measurements of other biological variables are even less consistent across studies. In order to advance wildlife sciences, we believe that standardization initiatives are required at an international level. © 2013 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gula, R., & Theuerkauf, J. (2013, October). The need for standardization in wildlife science: Home range estimators as an example. European Journal of Wildlife Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-013-0726-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free