Establishment and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Scoring System-RAAS (RDW, AGE, APACHE II, SOFA) for Sepsis by a Retrospective Analysis

21Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A modified scoring system based on the RDW, AGE, SOFA, and APACHE II score (RAAS score) was composed to investigated the short-, medium-, and long-term high risk of mortality in patients with sepsis identified early in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Data were collected from a total of 1066 sepsis patients in emergency department, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from March 2013 to April 2021, including 529 patients in the primary cohort and 537 patients in the validation cohort. By comparing each parameter and the area under ROC (AUC) and K-M (Kaplan–Meier) survival curve in different periods, valuable parameters were screened out to form a new scoring system, and finally the prediction model of the nomogram was built. Results: The RAAS scoring system, consisting of RDW, AGE, SOFA and APACHE II, is a 0–6 scale to reflect the severity of sepsis. AUC at 30, 60, and 90 days was 0.816, 0.815, and 0.820, respectively. K-M curves across six prognostic time periods in both databases showed survival probabilities with different RDW segments and RAAS scores. In the calibration curve, the results of the internal validation of the primary cohort and the results of the external validation cohort showed the prognostic accuracy of RAAS. Conclusion: The RAAS score system is a novel and reliable indicator to predict the short-term and medium-term mortality of patients with sepsis. With the increase of the RAAS score, the mortality of patients with sepsis gradually increases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y., Jiang, S., Li, W., Fan, Y., Leng, Y., & Gao, C. (2022). Establishment and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Scoring System-RAAS (RDW, AGE, APACHE II, SOFA) for Sepsis by a Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Inflammation Research, 15, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S348490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free