There is a need for novel teaching approaches to train biomedical engineers that are conversant across disciplines and have the technical skills to address interdisciplinary scientific and technological challenges. Here, we describe a graduate-level miniaturized biomedical device engineering course that has been taught over the last decade in in-person, remote, and hybrid formats. The course employs experiential learning components, including a proposal development and review that mimic the National Institutes of Health process and technical assignments that use raw research data to simulate a research experience. The effectiveness of the course was measured via pre-/post-course concept inventory surveys as well as course evaluations with targeted questions on the learning instruments. Statistical comparison of pre-/post-course survey scores suggests that the course was effective in students achieving the learning objectives, and comparison of relative increase in pre-/post-course survey scores across different instruction formats (i.e., in-person, remote, hybrid) showed minimal difference, suggesting that the teaching elements are readily transferrable to remote instruction.
CITATION STYLE
Goshi, N., Girardi, G., Kim, H., & Seker, E. (2023). Experiential Learning in a Biomedical Device Engineering Course: Proposal Development and Raw Research Data-Based Assignments. Biomedical Engineering Education, 3(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.