Experiential Learning in a Biomedical Device Engineering Course: Proposal Development and Raw Research Data-Based Assignments

  • Goshi N
  • Girardi G
  • Kim H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a need for novel teaching approaches to train biomedical engineers that are conversant across disciplines and have the technical skills to address interdisciplinary scientific and technological challenges. Here, we describe a graduate-level miniaturized biomedical device engineering course that has been taught over the last decade in in-person, remote, and hybrid formats. The course employs experiential learning components, including a proposal development and review that mimic the National Institutes of Health process and technical assignments that use raw research data to simulate a research experience. The effectiveness of the course was measured via pre-/post-course concept inventory surveys as well as course evaluations with targeted questions on the learning instruments. Statistical comparison of pre-/post-course survey scores suggests that the course was effective in students achieving the learning objectives, and comparison of relative increase in pre-/post-course survey scores across different instruction formats (i.e., in-person, remote, hybrid) showed minimal difference, suggesting that the teaching elements are readily transferrable to remote instruction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Goshi, N., Girardi, G., Kim, H., & Seker, E. (2023). Experiential Learning in a Biomedical Device Engineering Course: Proposal Development and Raw Research Data-Based Assignments. Biomedical Engineering Education, 3(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-022-00094-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free