Modal variety of microsatellite instability in human endometrial carcinomas

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Microsatellite instability (MSI) in human endometrial cancer (EC) was analysed using a unique fluorescent technique. MSI is associated with various human neoplasms. However, the reported frequency of MSI differs widely in each malignancy. Methodological difficulties have in fact been pointed out in its assay techniques. Methods: We previously established a sensitive fluorescent technique in which the major methodological problems are overcome. Application of this technique has revealed two distinct modes of microsatellite alterations, i.e. Type A and Type B. In the present study, we have applied this technique to 94 ECs. Results: Significant microsatellite alterations were observed in 38 (40.4 %) tumours of the panel. The two modes, Type A and Type B, were indeed observed in this malignancy. More importantly, we found that the modes more closely correlated with the molecular and clinicopathological backgrounds of the tumours than the established and widely used MSI grades, MSI-H and MSI-L. Type B MSI widely correlated with family history of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer-associated cancers, whereas MSI-H only did with that of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, mutation in the KRAS oncogene, which has been regarded as generally infrequent in microsatellite-unstable tumours, was clearly associated with Type A MSI. Conclusions: Our observations may suggest a biological relevance and a potential utility of the modal classification of MSI and, furthermore, added complexities to genomic instability underlying tumourigenesis in human endometrium.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eto, T., Zhao, Y., Maruyama, A., Miyashita, K., Yasui, A., Nakao, S., … Saito, T. (2016). Modal variety of microsatellite instability in human endometrial carcinomas. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 142(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-015-2030-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free