Oral history as empirical corrective: Including women’s experiences in international law

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter adds to a growing body of literature that aims to ‘correct’ the traditional lack of attention to the role of individual women lawyers who have exercised their power as active citizens to participate in the development of international law. The chapter highlights the unique contribution to international disability law of Rosemary Kayess, through a close examination of her oral history, which was drawn from a larger corpus of interviews recorded with ‘trailblazing’ Australian women lawyers. The approach adopted in the study is innovative in bringing together a legal and linguistic analysis of the interview with Rosemary Kayess that offers insights into those aspects of her personal and professional biography that most influenced and enabled her role in the drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. Thus the use of oral history in this study broadens and deepens our understanding of the possibilities for feminist engagement with international law and may hopefully inspire other women lawyers to take steps towards active citizenship on the international stage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rubenstein, K., & Isaac, A. (2019). Oral history as empirical corrective: Including women’s experiences in international law. In Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement with International Law (pp. 338–358). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363924.00029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free