Exploring the Value of Real-Time Medication Adherence Monitoring: A Qualitative Study

  • Faisal S
  • Ivo J
  • Abu Fadaleh S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Smart adherence products enable the monitoring of medication intake in real-time. However, the value of real-time medication intake monitoring to different stakeholders such as patients, their caregivers, clinicians, and insurers is not elucidated. The aim of this study was to explore the value different stakeholders place on the availability of smart adherence products and access to real-time medication intake data. A qualitative study design using semi-structured one-on-one virtual interviews was utilized. Schwartz’s theory of values provided the foundation for the interview questions, data were analyzed using Braun and Clark’s thematic analysis framework, and findings were mapped back to the constructs of Schwartz’s theory of values. A total of 31 interviews with patients, caregivers, healthcare providers, and representatives of private or public insurance providers were conducted. Three themes and ten subthemes were identified. Themes included perceptions of integrating smart medication adherence technologies and real-time monitoring, technology adoption factors and data management. Stakeholders place different values based on the motivators and goals that can drive product use for daily medication management. Stakeholders valued the availability of real-time medication taking data that allow clinicians to make timely data-driven recommendations to their patients that may improve medication management for patients and reduce the caregiver burden.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faisal, S., Ivo, J., Abu Fadaleh, S., & Patel, T. (2023). Exploring the Value of Real-Time Medication Adherence Monitoring: A Qualitative Study. Pharmacy, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy11010018

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

33%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free