Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin

33Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of seven adhesive systems on two substrates (enamel and dentin). Methods and Materials: Class V cavities were performed in buccal and lingual surfaces of 56 bovine incisors. The cervical margin was located in dentin and the incisai margin in enamel. The specimens were randomly divided into seven groups (n=16), according to the adhesive system employed: Single Bond; Excite; One Step Plus; Gluma One Bond; Magic Bond; One Up Bond F; and One Coat Bond. The cavities were incrementally filled with a hybrid composite Filtek Z250 and polymerized with a XL 3000 light curing unit. After polishing, the specimens were submitted to thermal cycling followed by dye immersion. Leakage was evaluated under magnification (40X) based on a standard ranking. Data were subjected to statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis). Results: Enamel margins exhibited lower leakage than dentin margins (p<0.01). The majority of the specimens were leakage-free and materials performed similarly. Conversely, in dentin most of the specimens exhibited the highest leakage degree and significant differences among materials (p<0.05) were found, with Excite exhibiting the lowest leakage degree. It was concluded enamel provided better sealing and the adhesive system was a significant factor only in dentin.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Araújo, C. S., Da Silva, T. I., Ogliari, F. A., Meireles, S. S., Piva, E., & Demarco, F. F. (2006). Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 7(5), 026–033. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-7-5-26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free