Producing short counterexamples using "crucial events"

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ideally, a model checking tool should successfully tackle state space explosion for complete system validation, while providing short counterexamples when an error exists. Techniques such as partial order (p.o.) reduction [1,2] are very effective at tackling state space explosion, but do not produce short counterexamples. On the other hand, directed model checking [3,4] techniques find short counterexamples, but are prone to state space explosion in the absence of errors. To the best of our knowledge, there is currently no single technique that meets both requirements. We present such a technique in this paper. For a subset of CTL, which we call CETL (Crucial Event Temporal Logic), we show that there exists a unique minimum set of events in each program trace whose execution is both necessary and sufficient to lead to an error state. These events are called "crucial events". We show how crucial events can be used to produce short counterexamples, while also providing state space reduction. We have implemented the techniques presented here as an extension to the model checker SPIN, called SPICED (Simple PROMELA Interpreter with Crucial Event Detection). Experimental results are presented. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kashyap, S., & Garg, V. K. (2008). Producing short counterexamples using “crucial events.” In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5123 LNCS, pp. 491–503). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70545-1_47

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free