How good can our beamlines be?

7Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The accuracy of X-ray diffraction data depends on the properties of the crystalline sample and on the performance of the data-collection facility (synchrotron beamline elements, goniostat, detector etc.). However, it is difficult to evaluate the level of performance of the experimental setup from the quality of data sets collected in rotation mode, as various crystal properties such as mosaicity, non-uniformity and radiation damage affect the measured intensities. A multiple-image experiment, in which several analogous diffraction frames are recorded consecutively at the same crystal orientation, allows minimization of the influence of the sample properties. A series of 100 diffraction images of a thaumatin crystal were measured on the SBC beamline 19BM at the APS (Argonne National Laboratory). The obtained data were analyzed in the context of the performance of the data-collection facility. An objective way to estimate the uncertainties of individual reflections was achieved by analyzing the behavior of reflection intensities in the series of analogous diffraction images. The multiple-image experiment is found to be a simple and adequate method to decompose the random errors from the systematic errors in the data, which helps in judging the performance of a data-collection facility. In particular, displaying the intensity as a function of the frame number allows evaluation of the stability of the beam, the beamline elements and the detector with minimal influence of the crystal properties. Such an experiment permits evaluation of the highest possible data quality potentially achievable at the particular beamline. © 2012 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Singapore - All Rights Reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode

39332Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scaling and assessment of data quality

4098Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Integration of macromolecular diffraction data

488Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mitigation strategies for radiation damage in the analysis of ancient materials

91Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robust structural analysis of native biological macromolecules from multi-crystal anomalous diffraction data

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Crystallographic phasing from weak anomalous signals

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liebschner, D., Dauter, M., Rosenbaum, G., & Dauter, Z. (2012). How good can our beamlines be? Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography, 68(10), 1430–1436. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444912034658

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 15

54%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14

52%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

33%

Physics and Astronomy 3

11%

Materials Science 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free