3% nebulized hypertonic saline versus normal saline for infants with acute bronchiolitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

4Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 3% nebulized hypertonic saline (NHS) in infants with acute bronchiolitis (AB). Methods: We systematically searched the PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, WANFANG, and VIP databases from inception to June 1, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials comparing NHS with 0.9% saline. Outcomes included the length of hospital stay (LOS), rate of hospitalization (ROH), clinical severity score (CSS), rate of readmission, respiratory distress assessment instrument, and adverse events. RevMan V5.4 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 27 trials involving 3495 infants were included in this study. Compared to normal saline, infants received 3% NHS showed better outcomes in LOS reduction (MD = -0.60, 95% CI [-1.04, -0.17], I2= 92%, P =.007), ROH decrease (OR = 0.74, 95% CI [0.59, 0.91], I2= 0%, P =.005), CSS improvement at day 1 (MD = -0.79, 95% CI [-1.23, -0.34], I2= 74%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, J. F., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z. B., Wang, J., & Bai, L. P. (2022). 3% nebulized hypertonic saline versus normal saline for infants with acute bronchiolitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (United States), 101(43), E31270. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000031270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free