LIBOR fallback and quantitative finance

8Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the expected discontinuation of the LIBOR publication, a robust fallback for related financial instruments is paramount. In recent months, several consultations have taken place on the subject. The results of the first ISDA consultation have been published in November 2018 and a new one just finished at the time of writing. This note describes issues associated to the proposed approaches and potential alternative approaches in the framework and the context of quantitative finance. It evidences a clear lack of details and lack of measurability of the proposed approaches which would not be achievable in practice. It also describes the potential of asymmetrical information between market participants coming from the adjustment spread computation. In the opinion of this author, a fundamental revision of the fallback’s foundations is required.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dynamic term structure models for SOFR futures

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

TERM RATES, MULTICURVE TERM STRUCTURES AND OVERNIGHT RATE BENCHMARKS: A ROLL–OVER RISK APPROACH

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rational savings account models for backward-looking interest rate benchmarks

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henrard, M. P. (2019). LIBOR fallback and quantitative finance. Risks, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks7030088

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 3

38%

Social Sciences 2

25%

Mathematics 2

25%

Physics and Astronomy 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0