Measurement characteristics of dietary psychosocial scales in a weight gain prevention study with 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls

7Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Few measurement instruments for children's eating behaviors and beliefs have been specifically validated for African-American children. Validation within this population is important because of potential cultural and ethnic influences. Objectives were to evaluate established and newly developed or adapted dietary psychosocial measures in a sample of 303 preadolescent African-American girls and their caregivers. Acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.70) was found for measures of girls' self-efficacy for healthy eating, outcome expectancies for healthy eating, positive family support for healthy eating and household availability of low-fat food and fruit, juice and vegetables (FJV). Evidence for concurrent validity was found with significant associations between self-efficacy for healthy eating and lower intake of energy (r = -0.17) and fat grams (r = -0.16). Greater FJV availability was associated with greater FJV intake (r = 0.14) and lower body mass index (BMI) in girls (r = -0.12). Positive family support for healthy eating was associated with higher BMI in girls (r = 0.41). These results contribute to the development of scales to evaluate prevention interventions related to dietary intake in African-American children. © The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sherrill-Mittleman, D. A., Klesges, L. M., Lanctot, J. Q., Stockton, M. B., & Klesges, R. C. (2009). Measurement characteristics of dietary psychosocial scales in a weight gain prevention study with 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls. Health Education Research, 24(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyn059

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 33

67%

Researcher 12

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 17

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 9

21%

Social Sciences 7

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free