Performance and limitations of the unsteady RANS approach

  • Schwarze R
  • Obermeier F
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Turbulent flows in complex geometries often exhibit an oscillating behavior of large coherent structures, even in the case of steady state boundary conditions. Recently, numerous efforts have been made to resolve these oscillations by means of numerical simulations. Unfortunately, large‐eddy simulations are often very time‐ and memory‐consuming in the case of complex flows. Therefore, the unsteady RANS (URANS) approach is an attractive alternative, especially when numerical simulations are used as a design and optimization tool.Here, two complex flow situations are presented, the tundish flow and a jet in a crossflow. For these flows, relationships between the Strouhal number and important flow parameters are known from experiments. In the paper, URANS models are applied to resolve those relationships also numerically. The evaluation of the numerical results demonstrates the abilities and the limitations of the URANS approach when resolving the dynamics of large coherent structures in complex flows. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwarze, R., & Obermeier, F. (2006). Performance and limitations of the unsteady RANS approach. PAMM, 6(1), 543–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200610252

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

77%

Researcher 3

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 22

96%

Chemical Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free