An assessment of a ‘training-of-trainers programme for clinic committees’ in a South African district: a qualitative exploratory study

4Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In South Africa (SA), clinics and community health centres are the predominant primary level health care facilities in the public health sector. As part of legislated health governance requirements, clinic committees (referring to those for clinics and community health centres) were established to provide management oversight and bring to bear the perspectives and participation of communities at Primary Health Care (PHC) facilities. Clinic committees need training in order to better understand their roles. Facilitators in a district of SA were trained through a designated programme, called the ‘PHC Facility Governance Structures Trainer-of-Facilitator (ToF) Learning Programme‘, in preparation for the training of clinic committees. This paper explores how the programme had evolved and was experienced by the trained facilitators, in a district in SA. Methods: We employed a retrospective qualitative case study design, guided by the Illuminative Evaluation Framework, with the training programme in the selected district as the case. The study assessed whether the intended aims of the training programme were clearly conveyed by the trainers, and how participants understood and subsequently conveyed the training programme intentions to the clinic committees. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with trainers and managers, complemented by a review of relevant policy and legislative documents, and published literature. Study participants were purposively selected based on their involvement in the development, facilitation or training of the programme. Thirteen individuals participated in the study, and 23 (national, provincial and partner) documents were reviewed. Results: Despite the different perceptions and understandings of the ToF Learning Programme, its overall aims were achieved. Trainers’ capacity was strengthened and clinic committees were trained accordingly. The training programme holds promise for possible national scale-up. The high quality of the interactive posters can be considered equally valuable as a training tool as the training manuals. Conclusions: Trainers’ capacity was strengthened and clinic committees were trained accordingly, despite deviations in implementation of the original training approach and plan.

References Powered by Scopus

Document analysis as a qualitative research method

4924Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The flawed four-level evaluation model

530Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Community participation in health systems research: A systematic review assessing the state of research, the nature of interventions involved and the features of engagement with communities

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A ‘training of trainers’ programme for operational research: increasing capacity remotely

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of an HIV-related Education Intervention Scale-up: A Hybrid Type 3 Effectiveness-implementation Study in the Dominican Republic

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esau, N., English, R., & Shung-King, M. (2020). An assessment of a ‘training-of-trainers programme for clinic committees’ in a South African district: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05921-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

28%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

22%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free