Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships?

114Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The influence of morphemic relationships on the repetition priming effect, which is presumed to provide an index of lexical organization, was examined in several experiments. An attempt was made in all experiments to minimize nonlexical contributions to these lexical effects by placing related items in a context of unrelated items. Priming among regularly and irregularly suffixed morphemic relatives, associates, and synonyms was examined. Morphemic relatives and associates yielded significant priming, although priming was largest for regularly suffixed morphemic relatives. Priming was not obtained for synonyms. In previous research (Napps & Fowler, 1987), priming was not found among orthographically and phonologically related words. The results are interpreted to mean that morphemic priming is not the result of the convergence of semantic, orthographic, and phonological relationships, but rather that morphemic relationships are represented explicitly in the lexicon. © 1989 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Basic objects in natural categories

3727Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings

3513Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive representations of semantic categories

2857Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading

762Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students

634Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective

550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Napps, S. E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 729–739. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202634

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

29%

Researcher 6

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 13

46%

Linguistics 12

43%

Neuroscience 2

7%

Social Sciences 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free