Correlates of change in accelerometer-assessed total sedentary time and prolonged sedentary bouts among older English adults: Results from five-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Development of effective strategies to reduce sedentary time among older adults necessitates understanding of its determinants but longitudinal studies of this utilising objective measures are scarce. Methods: Among 1536 older adults (≥60 years) in the EPIC-Norfolk study, sedentary time was assessed for seven days at two time-points using accelerometers. We assessed associations of change in total and prolonged bouts of sedentary time (≥ 30 minutes) with change in demographic and behavioural factors using multi-level regression. Results: Over follow-up (5.3±1.9 years), greater increases in total sedentary time were associated with older age, being male, higher rate of increase in BMI, lower rate of increase in gardening (0.5 min/day/yr greater sedentary time per hour/week/yr less gardening, 95% CI 0.1, 1.0), a lower rate of increase in walking (0.2 min/day/yr greater sedentary time per hour/week/yr less walking, 95% CI 0.1, 0.3) and a higher rate of increase in television viewing. Correlates of change in prolonged sedentary bouts were similar. Conclusion: Individuals in specific sub-groups (older, male, higher BMI) and who differentially participate in certain behaviours (less gardening, less walking and more television viewing) but not others increase their sedentary time at a higher rate than others; utilising this information could inform successful intervention content and targeting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yerrakalva, D., Hajna, S., Wijndaele, K., Westgate, K., Khaw, K. T., Wareham, N., … Brage, S. (2021). Correlates of change in accelerometer-assessed total sedentary time and prolonged sedentary bouts among older English adults: Results from five-year follow-up in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Aging, 13(1), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202497

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free