14C and the iron age chronology debate: Rehov, Khirbet En-Nahas, Dan, and Megiddo

29Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A recently published volume, The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science (Levy and Higham 2005), provides data related to the debate over the chronology of the Iron Age strata in the Levant (for a review, see Carmi 2006). The present article comments on several chapters in the volume. The article highlights methodological problems, such as insecure stratigraphic provenance of 14C samples, and demonstrates how unjustified selection of data can bias the result. The article offers a new interpretation to some of the results and shows that the full set of measurements from Tel Rehov supports the Low Chronology system. © 2006 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Finkelstein, I., & Piasetzky, E. (2006). 14C and the iron age chronology debate: Rehov, Khirbet En-Nahas, Dan, and Megiddo. Radiocarbon, 48(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200038819

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘2000.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

64%

Researcher 2

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

36%

Arts and Humanities 4

36%

Environmental Science 2

18%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0